JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)July 18, 2005

A- de 2005

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto

✓Claimant Frank Eliecer Mozo Rovira

✓
Topic · hard data
Solicitud Incidente De Desacato De La Sentencia T-328/05. De Manera Reiterada La Jurisprudencia De La Corte Constitucional Ha Sostenido Que El Juez Competente Para Conocer Del Tramite Del Incidente De Desacato Es El Juez De Primera Instancia. Rechaza El Incidente De Desacato Propuesto
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Incidente De Desacato
  • Control horizontal cuando no existe superior jerárquico
  • Improcedencia por no interponerse ante juez de primera instancia
Juez De Primera Instancia
  • Competencia para conocer incidente de desacato
2 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. RESUELVE
  2. RECHAZAR el incidente de desacato de la Sentencia T-328 de 2005, interpuesto por FRANK ELIÉCER MOZO ROVIRA.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.